top of page

CONCLUSION

Overall, this project was very enjoyable and rewarding.

We were able to effectively adjust to our user feedback to create a prototype which reflected their wishes.

The VR aspect was quite difficult to use at first, but after trial and error, we got the hang of it.

With a much longer amount of time to complete the project and a larger team, we could have produced a higher-fidelity product.

ETHICS

Ethically, our project is reasonably safe.

The main ethical considerations around the app involve the use of VR itelf. VR can cause eye strain if over-used and can cause nausea for certain members of the population, though this is mostly for environments involving quick movements.

These problems are ameliorated by encouraging our participants to take regular breaks and cease using the program if they feel nauseous at all.

Our user testing was completed in the strictest confidence and no users' names have been included for ethical purposes. All users completed consent forms before testing.

REFERENCES

Alcock, J. (2018). Belief: What It Means to Believe and Why Our Convictions Are So Compelling (1st ed.). Prometheus        Books.

 

Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Chapter: Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In

      Spence, K. W., & Spence, J. T. The psychology of learning and motivation (2). New York: Academic Press. 

 

Bartlett, F.C. (1932). Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge University Press.

​

Huttner, J. and Robra-Bissantz, S. (2017). An Immersive Memory Palace: Supporting the Method of Loci with Virtual

      Reality. Twenty-third Americas Conference on Information Systems.

​

Legge, E., Madan, C., Ng, E. and Caplan, J. (2012). Building a memory palace in minutes: Equivalent memory

      performance using virtual versus conventional environments with the Method of Loci. Acta Psychologica, 141(3),          380-390.

​

Levin, J. (1993). Mnemonic Strategies and Classroom Learning: A Twenty-Year Report Card. The Elementary School

      Journal, 94(2), 235-244.

​

Manalo, E., Bunnell, J. K., and Stillman, J. A. (2000). The use of Process Mnemonics in Teaching Students with

      Mathematics Learning Disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 23(2), 137–156.

​

McCabe, J. (2015). Location, Location, Location! Demonstrating the Mnemonic Benefit of the Method of Loci. 

 

       Teaching of Psychology, 42(2),169-173.

​

Miller, G., & Obara, S. (2017). Finding meaning in mathematical mnemonics. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 73(3),

     13-18.

​

O’Hara, R., Brooks, J., Friedman, L., Schröder, C., Morgan, K. and Kraemer, H. (2007). Long-term effects of mnemonic

     training in community-dwelling older adults. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 41(7), 585-590.

​

Krokos, E., Plaisant, C., & Varshney, A. (2018). Virtual memory palaces: immersion aids recall. Virtual Reality, 1-15.

​

Roediger, H. L. (1980). The effectiveness of four mnemonics in ordering recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology:

      Human Learning and Memory, 6 (5).

​

Seay,S.S. & McAlum,H. G. (2010). The Use /Application of Mnemonics As A Pedagogical Tool in Auditing. Academy of

      Educational Leadership Journal, 4 (2), 33-47.

​

Sternberg, R. J. (1999). Cognitive psychology (2nd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.

​

Thompson, M., Johansen, D., Stoner, R., Jarsted, A., Sorrells, R., McCarroll, M. (2017). Advances in Physiology

     Education, 41(4), 518-521.

​

Vindenes J., de Gortari A.O., & Wasson B. (2018) Mnemosyne: Adapting the Method of Loci to Immersive Virtual

     Reality. AVR 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 10850, 205-213.

​

bottom of page